Australia’s highestthat media outlets are “publishers” of allegedly defamatory comments posted by third parties on their official Facebook pages
By ROD McGUIRK Associated Press
September 8, 2021, 4:51 AM
• 3 min read
On Wednesday, CANBERRA, Australia — Australia’s highest court ruled that media outlets are “publishers” of allegedly defamatory comments posted by — Fairfax Media Publications, Nationwide News, and Australian News Channel — that for people to be publishers, they must be aware of the defamatory content and intend to convey it. In a 5-2 had participated in their communication by facilitating and encouraging the comments.on their official Facebook pages. The High Court dismissed an argument by some of Australia’s largest media organizations
The Supreme Court in 2017 was put on hold while deciding whether the media companies were liable for Facebook users’ comments was decided.to be sued for defamation by former juvenile detainee Dylan Voller. Voller wants to sue the television broadcaster and newspaper pages of The Sydney Morning Herald, The Australian, Centralian Advocate, Sky News Australia, and The Bolt Report. His defamation case launched in the New South Wales state
The companies posted content on their pages about news stories about Voller’s time in a Northern Territory juvenile detention center. responded by posting comments that Voller alleges were defamatory. News Corp Australia, which owns the two broadcast programs and two of the three newspapers targeted in the defamation case, to be changed. The ruling was “significant for anyone who maintains a public page by finding they can be liable for comments posted by others even when they are unaware of those comments,” News Corp Australia executive chairman Michael Miller said.
“This highlights the need for urgent legislative reform. I call on Australia’s attorneys general to social media in the future,” a Nine statement said.this anomaly and bring Australian law into line with comparable Western democracies,” Miller added. Nine, the new owner of The Sydney Morning Herald, hoped a current review of state and territory governments would consider the ruling and its consequences for publishers. “We are disappointed with the outcome of that decision, as it will have ramifications for what we can post on
“We also note the social media mob attacks,” a lawyers’ statement said.the likes of Facebook have taken since the Voller case first started, which now allow publishers to switch off comments on stories,” Nine added. Facebook did not immediately . Voller’s for its wider implications for publishers. “This is a historic step forward in achieving justice for Dylan and protecting individuals, especially those in a vulnerable position, from being the subject of unmitigated
“This decision put responsibility where it should be; onwith huge resources, to monitor public comments where they know there is a strong likelihood of an individual being defamed,” the statement added. Courts have previously ruled that people can be held liable for the continued publication of defamatory , such as notice boards, only after they became aware of the comments. The High Court decision upholds the rulings of two lower courts on liability.