signature border wall project would lose much of its funding as well as the fast-track status that enabled it to bypass environmental regulations under a new Biden administration plan
By BEN FOX Associated Press
June 11, 2021, 9:35 PM
• 4 min read
WASHINGTON — Former President Donald Trump’s signature border wall project would lose much of its funding and the fast-track status that enabled it to bypass environmental regulations under aannounced Friday. suspended the construction of the wall upon taking office while his administration reviewed the project. That angered Republicans in Congress, eager to see it go forward amid an increase in apprehensions of migrants along the southwest border.
The new plan does not cancel the wall project outright. However, it’s still likely toin Congress, where many Republicans are eager to promote a project closely associated with the former president. Biden plans to return more than $2 billion that the diverted from the Pentagon to help pay for the wall and use other money appropriated by Congress to address “urgent life, safety, and environmental issues” created by the construction. It also asks lawmakers not to provide any for what the Biden team believes is an unnecessary effort.
“Building a massiveand costs American taxpayers billions of dollars is not a serious policy solution or responsible use of federal funds,” the Office of Management and Budget said in a statement outlining the plan. For decades, the government has built walls and other barriers along the 2,000-mile (3,200-kilometer) U.S.-Mexico border to eliminate some more accessible routes of avoiding checkpoints. Trump turned the issue into a centerpiece of his political identity.
Trump vowed to build a “virtually impenetrable” wall, insisting it would be paid for by Mexico, which never happened. Instead, his administration set aside about $15 billion through congressional appropriations and taking the money from the Pentagon and other parts of the government. Thebuilt about 450 miles (725 kilometers) of the wall, moving quickly and waiving requirements for environmental reviews and mediation, though only about 52 miles (84 kilometers) were in areas where no barrier previously existed.
Biden’s decision to suspend construction prompted Republican senators to ask the Governmentto investigate whether the administration violated federal law in not using appropriated money for its intended purpose. The administration said Friday that it would use funds set aside by Congress for “their appropriated purpose, as required by law” but is requesting no new money for wall construction in the Department of Homeland Security’s 2022 budget.
Biden is instead seeking money for increased technology at the ports of entry and elsewhere,to stop illegal immigration and drug smuggling at the border. The administration said it would return $2 billion from the Pentagon and use it for the construction projects for which the money was initially intended. That includes $79 million for an elementary school for the children of American service members in Germany, $25 million for a fire and rescue station at Tyndall Base in Florida, and $10 million to expand defenses against North Korean ballistic missiles at Fort Greely in Alaska.
It plans to use the approximately $1.9 million remaining appropriated by Congress for the wall for drainage and erosion control or other environmental problems caused by wall construction in the Rioof Texas and elsewhere. Dozens of advocacy organizations have called on the Biden administration to pay for the restoration of sensitive wildlife habitat and land considered sacred to damaged by wall construction. “This is a welcome, sensible to begin healing the devastation that Trump inflicted on the borderlands,” said Paulo Lopes, a senior policy land specialist for the Center for Biological Diversity.
The administration doesn’t explicitly Security determines it’s not needed. . Greg Abbott, a Republican, said Thursday that the with Mexico but offered no details, including precisely where or what they would look like. He has promised more details . “We need to recognize that the numbers of people coming across the border are just going to continue to increase unless we change the game plan,” Abbott said. Associated Press writers Anita Snow in Phoenix and Paul Weber in Austin, Texas, contributed to this report.any new walls. But it review. It will review ongoing efforts to seize land from property owners by eminent domain. It will return parcels to the owners if the Department of Homeland