BEIJING — A joint WHO-China study on the origins of researchers proposed further research in every area except the lab leak hypothesis.that transmission of the virus from bats to humans through another animal is the most likely scenario and that a slab leak is “extremely unlikely,” according to a draft copy obtained by The Associated Press. The findings were extensive, as expected, and left many questions unanswered, but the the team’s conclusions. The
The report’s release has been repeatedly delayed, raising questions about whether the Chinese side was trying to skew the conclusions to prevent release it ahead of publication. It wasn’t clear whether the report might still be changed before its release.. Late last week, a official said he expected it would be ready for release “in the next few days.” The AP received what appeared to be a near-final version on Monday from a Geneva-based diplomat from a WHO-member country. The diplomat did not want to be identified because they were not authorized to
The researchers listed four scenarios inof the virus named SARS-CoV-2. Transmission through a second animal was topping the list, which they said was likely to be very reasonable. They evaluated direct spread from bats to humans as doable and said spread through “cold-chain” was possible but not likely. The closest relative of the virus that causes COVID-19 has been found in bats, which are known to carry coronaviruses. However, the that “the evolutionary distance between these bat viruses and SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to be several decades, suggesting a missing link.”
The report is mainly based on a visit by a WHO team of international experts to Wuhan, the Chinese city where COVID-19 was first detected, from mid-January to mid-February. It said highly similar viruses had been found in pangolins but also noted that mink and cats are susceptible to COVID, suggesting they could be carriers. Peter Ben Embarek, the WHO expert who led the Wuhan mission, said Friday that the report had been finalized, fact-checked fact-checked slated. “I expect that in the next few days, that whole process will be completed, and we will be able to release it publicly,” he said.
The draft report is inconclusive on whether the outbreak started at a Wuhan seafood market, with one of the earliest clusters of cases in December 2019. The discovery of other issues before the Huananoutbreak suggests it may have started elsewhere. But the milder cases could have gone undetected, which could be a link between the market and earlier issues. “No firm conclusion, therefore, about the role of the Huanan market in the outbreak’s origin, or how the infection was introduced into the market, can currently be drawn,” the .
As the pandemic spread globally, China found samples of the virus on the packaging of frozen foodand, in some cases, have tracked localized outbreaks to them. The report said that the cold chain, as it is known, can be a driver of long-distance but was skeptical it could have triggered the outbreak. The the risk is lower than through human-to-human respiratory infection, and most experts agree.
“While there is some evidence for the possible reintroduction of SARS-CoV-2 through the handling of imported contaminated frozen products in Chinawave, this would be extraordinary in 2019 where e the virus was not widely circulating,” the study said. Associated Press writers Victoria Milko in Jakarta, Indonesia, and Jamey Keaten contributed. The AP Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.