In the last month, Netflix has premiered two very different series primarily set on academic campuses that feature women in leadership positions historically filled by white men: the third season of “Sex Education” and “The Chair.” Yes, it isprofessional and interior lives, especially women of color, who’ve risen through a system against all odds. But the challenges women face in those posts make you wonder whether this success is even worth it.
It’s a demoralizing thought that neither show has any qualms about portraying. Take, for instance, Hope Haddon (Jemima Kirke), the new headmistress at Moordale High on “Sex Education.” On the surface, she has. Though she instantly becomes the bane of her students’ existence when she applies conservative and borderline abusive radical sex positivity, she seems to have achieved a level of power that is still too rare for women in education.
But “Sex Education” peers behind that unpleasant exterior to reveal this to be a double-edged sword. The amount of pressure Hope is under has partially exacerbated her long battle with infertility. In addition, her appointment is tokenized. Her male superior (Alistair Petrie) and predecessor constantly hound her to enforce the rigid standards previously set in place to restore the school’s more chaste reputation. Whatever individual goals she might have once gained this went right out the window to uphold a Tory standard that does little more than support old patriarchy.
Hope’s situation raises the question: Which teacher of 17 years at Harrison High School in New York and a doctoral candidate looking to defend her dissertation, recognizes firsthand that when it comes to moving up the ranks in academia, there is an unfair benefit to preserving tradition as opposed to challenging it.to ascend in academia — and, even more critical, which are not? In the who will essentially carry out the initiatives and traditions established by the men before her. Jessica Maricevic, an English
“They’ll pick and choose if there are any other women within the district that they would like to see carry on, like the example [in ‘Sex Education’],” she told HuffPost. “The system’s rationale for why they want to keep some in line, and others they pluck out is [about] power and control.” It’s one reason Maricevic has encountered obstacles along her path toward advancement. She’s been trying to institute a new course at her school that could propel her as a leader in her field and make her a more attractive doctoral candidate, and it continues to be stalled for one reason after the next.
“I asked, ‘Is this the protocol every teacher has gone through to present a rationale for why this course matters?'” she said. “And you get, ‘Well, every course is different.’ So, the answer is no.” Still, these hoops women jump through are the onlyprofessionally. “If you want to advance, or responsibilities, you have to look in leadership,” Maricevic said. “Because you can’t go to a neighboring town and just continue and start over because you have too many years in. That hurts you if you want to stay in the classroom.”
Maricevic’s experience trying to innovate her students’ education and move up in her career is akin to Yaz’s (Nana Mensah) on “The Chair.” Yaz is a Black English professor seeking tenure at the prestigious Pembroke University. She encourages herbeyond the white classics — a curriculum her colleagues (Holland Taylor and Bob Balaban) hold dear — and is met with multilevel opposition.
But when her friend, Ji-Yoon (Sandra Oh), anprofessor, is appointed chair of the English department, Yaz hopes she can finally accelerate her career now that another woman of color is in a higher position advocating on her behalf. But much like Hope, Ji-Yoon is powerless in her new role, balancing the expectations of the older white male establishment with her own goals. As a result, both women’s dreams are crushed.
Ji-Yoon spends so much true path at Pembroke. It’s a glum outcome for a series that introduces both as revolutionary characters. But the events mirror the real-life experiences of women who are compelled to rethink their paths in an academic culture that remains unflappable.to protect her problematic white male love interest (Jay Duplass), a recent widow drowning in booze, from sabotaging his career that she ends up effecting no real change. She is rendered ineffective as a leader and must return to strictly being a professor, while Yaz considers accepting an offer from Yale and abandoning her
Dr. Amanda López, a tenured associate professor of history, chair of the History andDepartment, and president of the Faculty Senate at Saint Xavier University, got into academia because she loves studying and teaching Mexican history. But like Yaz, the politics at the college has led her to examine other opportunities, despite being proud of her work.
“They’re trying to find ways to discredit my voice, and that’s the deterrent for people gaining positions of power in their universities: They are going to be called out,” said López, who is also Saint Xavier’s director of the Latin American studies program. “At a certain point, you’re like, ‘This is not what I got into academia to do. Is it worth it?'”
Her last question calls for a deep reflection on the path to success in education. For women like Hope, it’s headmistress or principal. For Yaz and Ji-Yoon, it’s a tenured professor and chair of a department space for them to speak more freely with less retaliation. But López admitted that “success for me is not ever having to be chair again” and being able to teach.
Ji-Yoon ultimately went back to that space, albeit involuntarily, and seemed satisfied and slightly relieved at the end of “The Chair.” But Dr. Tia Sherèe Gaynor, Taft professor of social justice at the University of Cincinnati, has rewired her entire thinking around tenure since recently earning it. That’s partly because of the amount of work you must put in as part of the evaluation for promotion, including doing research and writing articles.
For women of color, that work is on top of navigating microaggressions in their careers. “This is the landscape that we have to navigate. The situation withfor faculty of color and women of color — I don’t think we were particularly surprised that it happened,” Gaynor said, referring to the University of North Carolina controversy where Hannah-Jones was initially denied a tenured position by the board of trustees.
It’s one reason why Gaynor has begun to question her relationship with tenure. “There is this false narrative about the importance of tenure,” she said. “When I got tenure, I realized that it is this constructed thing that people put a value on, but itthat that’s your value as a professional. Some amazing researchers don’t get tenure.”
Perhaps that’s something screenwriters like those for “Sex Education” and “The Chair” should consider. While it’s great for a series to highlight women in positions of power in academia, it would be even more fascinating to see more redefine what success looks like for womenand beyond. Calling all HuffPost superfans! Sign up for membership to and help shape HuffPost’s next chapter.